It took me a long time to admit my utopia had flaws. Everything cannot be equal. That does not mean I advocate for inequality but I notice more that all the trees don’t look the same. I thought it made more sense for everything to be equal. That seemed noble. Can one dispute the fairness of equality? But the facts are they don’t play the same – meaning everybody. They don’t dance the same, paint the same, write the same, play chess or cook the same. They have different senses of humour and hairdos. Talent and individuality are unique. Thought I could show anyone how to do whatever I know on piano. I like that line of thought, I still approach teaching with the onus on me reaching the student – but now I also reflect on the two way street. Every pairing has chemistry, some have instant insight, some move like a sloth on sedatives. When I was a teenager I had fun disputing politics with my dad. He was a member of the CCF when he was young, the socialist party 1930 – 1960. Later in life he did not have allegiance to one side which pissed me off. I thought the left superior, so why didn’t he? It was about equality, right? How could one dare view the world any different than that?
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Previous Post: day tripper
Next Post: glenn greenwald
Permalink
Is that what equality means? Of course everyone is different and unique. Of course some people are better at some things than others. And sure, we should be recognized for the ways we are unique, for our talent, even for the ways we might be better at things than other people. But so what? Does that also mean some people should have so much more power than others? So much more money, more food? Maybe some people make better leaders, but do we have to carry them around on our backs? Should talented musicians be worshipped like gods? Everyone is different, but everyone should have food and freedom and love and a place to live, no?
Permalink
What are you actually asking?